So the tutorials have begun! And for this semester I have chosen to enroll in the theme class of 'MODULES FOR THE CONSUMERS'. Looks like an interesting topic -- I can't wait to see what the semester brings!
During the Tutorial we were given a brief introduction into what exactly 'Modules for the consumers' meant. And essentially (from what I was told) modules for consumers comes from the theory of a "plug-in city" a city in which is "continuously changing". Another theory it was derived from was WASTE = FOOD (food for something), in other words architecture that can be broken down/re-used for something/someone else when its no longer needed.
-- It's an interesting topic -- Don' you think?? I should delve into it a bit more and put some research up!
___________________________________________________________________________________________
Now, during the TUT we split into groups of 6 and in reference to our next project (project 2) we were to discuss the site (Howard Smith Wharves) and analyse what would be the
"WORSE THING FOR THE SITE"
"WORSE THING FOR THE SITE"
- Not re-connect the site to New Farm and the surrounding city - context
- Not consider the elements of the site (Cliff face - Heritage Buildings - Brisbane River - Story Bridge)
- Knocking down the heritage buildings (ignoring historical significance)
- Not creating multiple access points (without over-doing it)
- Not making the site a 'Node' point ( A 'destination' - a place of 'intersection')
- Placing aesthetically displeasing buildings on the site
- Not considering Q500 (flood levels)
- Building in Brisbane River and disrupting the river flow
- Not designing to, accommodate for/acknowledge, existing users of the site
- Not 'Activating' the space
- Not considering sustainability (recycle/re-use material, etc)
- Not designing architecture for the future
- Knocking down the heritage buildings (ignoring historical significance)
- Not creating multiple access points (without over-doing it)
- Not making the site a 'Node' point ( A 'destination' - a place of 'intersection')
- Placing aesthetically displeasing buildings on the site
- Not considering Q500 (flood levels)
- Building in Brisbane River and disrupting the river flow
- Not designing to, accommodate for/acknowledge, existing users of the site
- Not 'Activating' the space
- Not considering sustainability (recycle/re-use material, etc)
- Not designing architecture for the future
No comments:
Post a Comment